NEW YORK, June 5 — The New Yorker has published a lengthy investigation into OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, based on an 18-month effort drawing on internal documents, notes attributed to co-founder Ilya Sutskever, material from executive Dario Amodei and more than 100 interviews.
The investigation describes several instances in which Altman gave incorrect information to the board and colleagues, including references to safety approvals and legal opinions that did not exist. This has raised questions about the company’s governance and leadership. OpenAI’s shift from its original nonprofit mission toward a commercial structure is also scrutinized in the piece, as development accelerated and safety teams were reduced.
The company now carries large financial commitments that some board members view as risky.
The Investigation’s Findings
The reporting is based on a thorough review of internal documents and interviews with key figures, including notes attributed to co-founder Ilya Sutskever and material from executive Dario Amodei.
The investigation sheds light on the company’s decision-making processes and the role of its leadership in shaping its direction. The fact that Altman gave incorrect information to the board and colleagues is a significant finding, and it has implications for the company’s governance and accountability.
The reduction of safety teams and the shift toward a commercial structure also raise important questions about the company’s priorities and values.
Implications and Next Steps
The New Yorker’s investigation adds to ongoing scrutiny of how OpenAI is governed, and it is likely to prompt further debate and discussion about the company’s leadership and direction.
OpenAI has previously defended its leadership and approach to safety amid earlier boardroom turmoil, but the new investigation is likely to put additional pressure on the company to address concerns and provide greater transparency. As the company moves forward, it will be important to watch how it responds to the investigation’s findings and how it addresses the concerns and criticisms that have been raised.
The company’s ability to balance its commercial goals with its commitment to safety and accountability will be closely watched, and its leadership will be under scrutiny as it navigates the challenges and opportunities of the AI landscape.
